What the agents actually worked on

Work type

Is AI moving the roadmap, or holding the line? The work-type mix answers it, session by session.

Why it matters

Not all engineering work is equal

Look past the volume

A high token count can be all maintenance. The mix tells you what that spend actually produced.

Watch features against maintenance

New features, bug fixes and maintenance trended side by side, so a slow drift away from building shows up early.

Show leadership what AI bought

The answer to what AI actually bought you is a breakdown of the work, per agent and per team.

How it works

How work type is classified

Sessions are read, not guessed at

Each session's prompts and edits are classified into a work type automatically. Nobody tags anything by hand.

It rolls up by team

Classifications roll up per agent, per team and per repository, and are trended across whatever window you pick.

Compare periods

Put this month's mix against last month's to see whether AI capacity moved toward new features, or quietly away from them.

AI ready at scale

Observability that was built for AI,
not repackaged for it

Run your agents and teams on the right foundation, so they don't approximate, they know

14 days, all features, no credit card required.

<1msAlert detection time
99.9%Platform uptime
10xData ingestion capacity