Modern generative AI (GenAI) workflows often involve multiple components—data retrieval, model inference, and post-processing—working in tandem. Monitoring traces and spans (the detailed records of these interactions) is essential for reliable performance.
AI agents quickly become black boxes without robust tracing, making errors difficult to pinpoint. Even a short script interacting with a large language model (LLM) may trigger dozens of downstream calls, and lacking visibility into each step can obscure the root causes of slowdowns or failures.
A late 2023 survey noted that 55% of organizations were piloting or deploying generative AI. Yet, many experienced:
Advanced monitoring techniques that focus on traces and spans address these challenges head-on. By providing end-to-end AI observability, teams can:
Identifying the root cause of performance issues becomes far more complex without such capabilities. Continuous monitoring has proven vital for guaranteeing sustained performance and security in GenAI applications.
This blog post will delve into the fundamentals of traces and spans, explore advanced monitoring methods, review leading tools, explore Coralogix’s AI Center for AI observability, and discuss the key challenges shaping the future of AI observability.
A trace is the end-to-end record of a request as it moves through an AI system, while a span represents a single operational step within that trace.
In a GenAI pipeline, each call—such as a database lookup or an LLM inference—becomes its own span. Collectively, these spans form a trace that shows exactly how a user request travels across different services.
Tracking these steps matters greatly in GenAI contexts. Modern applications often rely on multiple interconnected stages (e.g., embedding generation, context retrieval, LLM reasoning), and a single query can invoke dozens of microservices.
Spans capture timing and metadata for each step, clarifying which components might slow down or produce errors. Without this visibility, debugging becomes guesswork, particularly when issues arise in intermediate stages or external APIs.
Why trace context is key:
Consider a user query for an AI-driven helpdesk chatbot:
Trace context ties these four spans together under one trace, enabling engineers to see the entire sequence and quickly identify if any step—like the retrieval—took abnormally long.
To put it simply, traces and spans form the backbone of GenAI observability, offering a holistic view of AI workflows and greatly simplifying troubleshooting and optimization.
Real-time monitoring is crucial in GenAI workflows, where user requests often stream through multiple stages in seconds. By ingesting trace data as it’s generated, teams obtain immediate insights into system behavior.
If an LLM-based service suddenly slows down or errors spike, alerts will immediately trigger, minimizing user impact.
In practice, real-time oversight means no waiting for batch updates or delayed logs; a single user complaint about slow responses can quickly be correlated with recent trace data. Engineers can dive into relevant spans to see which step might have caused a bottleneck.
Distributed tracing is pivotal for GenAI systems built on microservices. A single user query may call an API gateway, a context retrieval service, and one or more LLM endpoints. Without distributed tracing, linking these interactions together is nearly impossible.
How it works:
This holistic view is invaluable when diagnosing multi-hop bottlenecks. For instance, a large language model might be fast, but the retrieval service feeding it data could be slow—causing the entire request to lag. Distributed tracing visualizes that chain of events, showing where the slowdown lies.
Collecting trace data is one thing; interpreting it effectively is another. Span representation often takes the form of waterfall charts or flame graphs, where each bar indicates a span’s start, duration, and end.
Advanced analysis may also involve flame graphs, which stack multiple requests to show aggregated data on where time is spent most. These views make even complex AI pipelines with multiple nested calls more transparent.
When something fails—be it a timeout in LLM inference or a data retrieval glitch—trace data can drastically reduce investigation times. Engineers begin with an error alert, open the relevant trace, and inspect the failing span.
In GenAI, root cause analysis might uncover bugs in prompt formatting or show that an external API was down. Teams typically sift through logs from multiple services without traces, hoping to match timestamps. Tracing speeds up this process, often pinpointing the exact failure within minutes.
As GenAI observability evolves, AI/ML engineers and DevOps teams face several challenges in monitoring traces and spans:
Coralogix’s AI Observability platform is a dedicated solution that integrates AI monitoring into a unified observability system, allowing teams to track and optimize GenAI workflows in real-time.
Unlike traditional monitoring tools, Coralogix bridges the gap between AI performance, cost efficiency, and security, making it an indispensable tool for stakeholders working with LLM-based applications.
Coralogix enables seamless real-time tracking of AI system behavior without disrupting performance. Its observability capabilities include:
For AI workflows with complex multi-stage processes (e.g., retrieval-augmented generation, vector searches, or multi-model chaining/AI agents), Coralogix provides granular span-level tracing:
Traditional observability tools lack AI-aware risk detection. Coralogix, however, includes built-in AI evaluators for:
Regarding output quality, evaluators ensure that the content produced by LLMs meets high standards. These include:
Coralogix AI Center provides a centralized monitoring hub where teams can track:
This single-pane-of-glass approach eliminates the need to cross-reference multiple tools, simplifying AI monitoring workflows.
Many AI-driven applications experience performance degradation as usage scales. Coralogix addresses these challenges through:
Unlike generic observability platforms, Coralogix’s AI Center is purpose-built for GenAI workflows, combining end-to-end tracing, cost tracking, and risk assessments in a single system. This makes it an ideal solution for AI engineers and enterprise teams seeking to enhance LLM reliability, efficiency, and security.
As generative AI adoption scales, so do the challenges in monitoring AI traces effectively. Traditional observability methods struggle to handle the high volume of trace data, the security risks unique to LLMs, and the complexity of distributed AI systems.
Modern AI observability platforms are tackling the deluge of LLM telemetry with scalable pipelines and smarter storage. At the same time, purpose-built stores enable no-sampling ingestion, retaining all traces for real-time querying without compromising performance. These advances ensure that high-volume GenAI traces can be captured and queried efficiently at scale.
Security guardrails are now integral to observability for Generative AI. Platforms increasingly detect and flag prompt injection attempts, hallucinated outputs, and toxic content in real-time.
Enhanced LLM observability APIs also provide out-of-band hooks on prompts and responses, creating detailed audit trails for compliance. These innovations strengthen trust by catching unauthorized or unsafe LLM behavior and supporting rigorous AI governance.
As AI systems become multimodal, observability is expanding beyond text. New techniques capture image, audio, and video interactions alongside text, stitching them into unified traces.
This holistic view allows monitoring complex GenAI workflows spanning vision, speech, and language. By correlating signals across modalities, teams gain complete visibility into AI behavior, ensuring reliability in rich, multimodal applications.
As generative AI adoption rises, robust trace monitoring has become essential for reliable and secure AI applications. Organizations can dramatically improve troubleshooting efficiency and system reliability by implementing advanced observability techniques such as distributed tracing, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive span analysis.
The challenges of scaling trace data, managing security risks, and monitoring complex distributed systems will shape the evolution of AI observability tools and practices in the coming years.
As the field matures, we expect more sophisticated solutions that balance performance optimization with security guardrails and compliance requirements. Ultimately, organizations implementing thorough trace monitoring will improve their AI systems’ reliability and gain competitive advantages through faster innovation cycles and enhanced user experiences.
Traces are end-to-end records of requests moving through an AI system, while spans represent individual operational steps within a trace, such as database lookups or LLM inferences.
Trace monitoring provides visibility into complex AI workflows, helping teams catch bottlenecks in real-time, accelerate troubleshooting, and reduce mean time to resolution (MTTR).
Coralogix provides real-time AI observability, span-level tracing for bottleneck identification, custom evaluations for AI-specific risks, and unified dashboards for performance and security.
Major challenges include the scalability of high-volume trace data, security risks like prompt injection attacks, and the complexity of monitoring distributed AI systems.
Distributed tracing links interactions across multiple services with a common trace identifier, helping engineers identify which microservice contributes most to latency or errors.
In 2025, AI isn’t just an add-on—it’s the engine powering everything from personalized customer experiences to mission-critical enterprise operations. Modern...
Or Jacobi
Monitoring AI model health is essential for ensuring models perform accurately, efficiently, and reliably in real-world settings. As AI systems...
Or Jacobi
In today’s AI-driven landscape, speed isn’t just a luxury—it’s a necessity. When AI models respond slowly, the consequences cascade beyond...
Alon Gubkin
