A Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a security solution designed to monitor, filter, and block harmful traffic to and from a web application. By analyzing HTTP traffic, it helps protect web applications from various attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, and other vulnerabilities that could compromise the security or functionality of the application.
Unlike traditional firewalls that safeguard the perimeter of a network by controlling inbound and outbound traffic based on IP addresses and ports, WAFs operate at the application layer. They apply a set of rules to HTTP/S GET and POST requests, enabling them to prevent attacks targeted at application vulnerabilities specifically.
Web application firewalls serve as a defensive barrier, positioned between the web application and the Internet, to inspect incoming traffic for malicious patterns or attack vectors. This is particularly important as web applications become increasingly complex and are often exposed to cyber attacks designed to exploit vulnerabilities within the application’s code.
WAFs also help in maintaining an organization’s compliance with industry regulations and standards that mandate data protection and cybersecurity measures. By providing detailed logs and reports on traffic and threats, they aid in forensic analysis and ensure that sensitive data transmitted through web applications remains secure against unauthorized access or breaches.
A web application firewall operates by inspecting and filtering HTTP/S requests before they reach the web application. It uses a set of predefined or dynamically learned rules to analyze the traffic for malicious content or patterns indicative of an attack.
When a request is deemed suspicious or dangerous based on these rules, the WAF can block it, allowing only legitimate traffic to pass through. This helps in mitigating potential threats before they can exploit vulnerabilities in the application.
Modern WAFs can also perform deep inspection of inbound and outbound content. They ensure that sensitive data does not leave the application in an unauthorized manner. By applying techniques such as SSL/TLS decryption, WAFs can scrutinize encrypted traffic, helping maintain the confidentiality and integrity of data transmissions.
Learn more in our detailed guide to WAF architecture (coming soon)
While all related to network security, these solutions have distinct roles.
WAFs focus on protecting web applications by inspecting HTTP/S traffic and identifying application-layer attacks.
Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) devices monitor network traffic to prevent vulnerability exploits regardless of the application. They operate primarily on the network layer, analyzing packets to detect and block attacks before they reach their targets.
Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) combine the functionalities of traditional firewalls with additional features like IPS and sometimes WAF capabilities. They provide a more comprehensive security approach by enforcing policy-based controls. They offer intrusion prevention and advanced inspection for inbound and outbound traffic across multiple layers of the OSI model.
Related content: Read our guide to WAF vs Firewall (coming soon)
Web application firewalls can be network-based, host-based, or cloud-based.
Network-based WAFs are deployed in-line at the network perimeter to protect the network’s web applications. This allows them to inspect all incoming and outgoing application traffic before it reaches the server or leaves the network. These WAFs offer high performance and low latency, making them suitable for environments that require speed and availability.
They achieve this with specialized hardware that can process large volumes of traffic without significantly impacting the response time or overall user experience. However, the deployment and maintenance of network-based WAFs require significant investment in infrastructure and expertise, making them more suited for large organizations with substantial IT resources.
Host-based WAFs are integrated into the web application’s hosting environment, offering a more customizable and cost-effective security solution. They run on the same server as the application, providing less network latency and the ability to tailor security rules to the needs of each application.
This integration allows for a deeper inspection of traffic and more granular control over the application’s responses to threats. However, running a host-based WAF requires additional resources from the host server, which can impact the performance of the web application if not managed properly. It also requires security expertise to configure and update rules.
Cloud-based WAFs offer a scalable security solution by providing protection as a service. This model eliminates the need for physical hardware or software installation, as the protection is applied remotely over the Internet. These WAFs easily integrate with existing applications, deploying security measures without significant upfront costs or complex configurations.
By leveraging global threat intelligence networks, cloud-based WAFs can quickly adapt to new threats and automatically update security policies across all protected applications. This ensures continuous protection against emerging vulnerabilities and attacks with minimal administrative overhead.
Web application firewalls typically offer the following capabilities:
Web application firewalls work by either allowing or denying web traffic.
The WAF specifies a list of trusted entities, such as IP addresses, URLs, or query parameters, that are allowed to interact with a web application. This approach assumes that anything not explicitly permitted is potentially harmful and should be blocked. Allowlisting helps minimize the attack surface, allowing only known safe interactions, though it requires continuous updates and has the potential for over-restriction.
The WAF identifies and blocks traffic based on known malicious sources, IP addresses, URLs, or patterns. This method restricts access from entities deemed dangerous, preventing them from exploiting vulnerabilities. By maintaining a list of disallowed sources and characteristics associated with cyber threats, WAFs can respond quickly to attacks, although they may not cover zero-day exploits or previously unidentified attackers.
The hybrid approach combines allowlisting and denylisting strategies to offer a balanced and adaptive security posture. By integrating the proactive control of allowlists with the reactive defense mechanisms denylists, the WAF provides protection against known threats while allowing legitimate traffic. This helps keep applications secure as new vulnerabilities emerge.
With a hybrid approach, the WAF can dynamically adjust security measures based on real-time analysis of traffic patterns and threat intelligence. It allows for the fine-tuning of security policies to minimize false positives.
WAF rules and policies specify how a web application firewall identifies and manages traffic, distinguishing between legitimate requests and potential threats.
Rules are specific conditions or patterns that traffic must meet to be considered safe or malicious. These include signatures of known attack vectors, such as SQL injection patterns or cross-site scripting (XSS) attempts, as well as anomalies in request sizes or frequencies that could indicate a DDoS attack.
Policies are sets of these rules, organized and applied in a manner to enforce the desired level of security for a web application. They dictate how incoming requests are inspected and what actions – allow, block, challenge, or log – should be taken based on the analysis.
Customizing WAF rules and policies is essential for adapting to the security requirements of each web application. This includes defining strict conditions for sensitive areas of an application while allowing more lenient access to public sections.
Here are some things to consider when evaluating WAF offerings.
When selecting a web application firewall, assess its impact on the performance of web applications. A WAF that introduces latency or reduces throughput can negatively affect user experience, leading to slow page loads and potentially driving users away.
To evaluate the performance overhead associated with a WAF, analyze how the WAF handles high traffic volumes and its ability to process complex security rules without degrading application responsiveness. Consider also the ability of the WAF solution to adapt to changing traffic patterns and application demands.
Evaluate the WAF’s accuracy in identifying and mitigating threats. Consider the WAF’s ability to correctly distinguish between malicious and legitimate traffic, minimizing false positives that can disrupt user experience and false negatives that could allow threats to pass through. Check also the WAF’s ability to adapt to new threats over time, including zero-day vulnerabilities.
To gauge these aspects, look into independent benchmarking studies or customer testimonials that shed light on real-world performance. Consider the frequency and process of updating threat intelligence and vulnerability signatures.
Scalability determines how well the solution can accommodate the growth of your web applications and handle increasing traffic volumes. A scalable WAF should seamlessly expand its capacity to protect more applications or absorb higher traffic without significant manual intervention or degradation in performance.
It should be able to distribute traffic load across multiple instances and automatically adjust its resources based on demand. The WAF solution should offer centralized management, enabling administrators to easily apply updates and configurations universally, regardless of how many web applications are covered.
Many industries are subject to strict data protection and privacy regulations. A WAF should help meet these requirements by providing strong security measures that prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data. This includes compliance with standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States, and other regional or sector-specific regulations.
Ensure that the WAF solution supports compliance to protect against data breaches and shield the organization from potential fines and legal repercussions associated with non-compliance.
It should also offer detailed logging and reporting capabilities to aid in audits and investigations.
Assess the WAF’s ability to integrate with existing infrastructure and security tools, including development, monitoring, and incident response platforms. Look for solutions that offer APIs for automation, support for common logging standards, and compatibility with SIEM systems to enable real-time analysis and alerting.
Additionally, consider the WAF’s ability to integrate with cloud services, CDN providers, and other third-party security solutions. This helps in creating a cohesive security posture across various components within the IT ecosystem.
Learn more in our detailed guide to WAF solutions (coming soon)
Coralogix sets itself apart in observability with its modern architecture, enabling real-time insights into logs, metrics, and traces with built-in cost optimization. Coralogix’s straightforward pricing covers all its platform offerings including APM, RUM, SIEM, infrastructure monitoring and much more. With unparalleled support that features less than 1 minute response times and 1 hour resolution times, Coralogix is a leading choice for thousands of organizations across the globe.