devsecops Archives

The modern technology landscape is ever-changing, with an increasing focus on methodologies and practices. Recently we’re seeing a clash between two of the newer and most popular players: DevOps vs DevSecOps. With new methodologies come new mindsets, approaches, and a change in how organizations run.

What’s key for you to know, however, is, are they different? If so, how are they different? And, perhaps most importantly, what does this mean for you and your development team?

In this piece, we’ll examine the two methodologies and quantify their impact on your engineers.

DevOps: Head in the Clouds

DevOps, the synergizing of Development and Operations, has been around for a few years. Adoption of DevOps principles has been common across organizations large and small, with elite performance through DevOps practices up 20%.

The technology industry is rife with buzzwords, and saying that you ‘do DevOps’ is not enough. It’s key to truly understand the principles of DevOps.

The Principles of DevOps

Development + Operations = DevOps.

There are widely accepted core principles to ensure a successful DevOps practice. In short, these are: fast and incremental releases, automation (the big one), pipeline building, continuous integration, continuous delivery, continuous monitoring, sharing feedback, version control, and collaboration.

If we remove the “soft” principles, we’re left with some central themes. Namely, speed and continuity achieved by automation and monitoring. Many DevOps transformation projects have failed because of poor collaboration or feedback sharing. If your team can’t automate everything and monitor effectively, it ain’t DevOps.

The Pitfalls of DevOps

As above, having the right people with the right hard and soft skills are key for DevOps success. Many organizations have made the mistake of simply rebadging a department, or sending all of their developers on an AWS course and all their infrastructure engineers on a Java course. This doesn’t work – colocation and constant communication (either in person, via Slack or Trello) are the first enablers in breaking down silos and enabling collaboration.

Not only will this help your staff cross-pollinate their expertise, saving on your training budget, but it enables the organic and seamless workflow. No two organizations or tech teams are the same, so no “one size fits all” approach can be successfully applied.

DevSecOps: The New Kid On The Block

Some people will tell you that they have been doing DevSecOps for years, and they might be telling the truth. However, DevSecOps as a formal and recognized doctrine is still in its relative infancy. If DevOps is the merging of Development and Operations, then DevSecOps is the meeting of Development, Security, and Operations.

Like we saw with DevOps adoption, it’s not just as simple as sending all your DevOps engineers on a security course. DevSecOps is more about the knowledge exchange between DevOps and Security, and how Security can permeate the DevOps process.

When executed properly, the “Sec” shouldn’t be an additional consideration, because it is part of each and every aspect of the pipeline.

What’s all the fuss with DevSecOps?

The industry is trending towards DevSecOps, as security dominates the agenda of every board meeting of every big business. With the average cost of a data breach at $3.86 million, it’s no wonder that organizations are looking for ways to incorporate security at every level of their technology stack.

You might integrate OWASP vulnerability scanning into your build tools, use Istio for application and container-level security and alerting, or just enforce the use of Infrastructure as Code across the board to stamp out human error.

However, DevSecOps isn’t just about baking Security into the DevOps process. By shifting security left in the process, you can avoid compliance hurdles at the end of the pipeline. This ultimately allows you to ship faster. You also minimize the amount of rapid patching you have to do post-release, because your software is secure by design.

As pointed out earlier, DevOps is already a successful methodology. Is it too much of a leap to enhance this already intimidating concept with security as well?

DevOps vs DevSecOps: The Gloves Are Off

What is the difference between DevOps and DevSecOps? The simple truth is that in the battle royale of DevOps vs DevSecOps, the latter, newer, more secure contender wins. Not only does it make security more policy-driven, more agile, and more enveloping, it also bridges organizational silos that are harmful to your overall SDLC.

The key to getting DevSecOps right lies in two simple principles – automate everything and have omnipotent monitoring and alerting. The reason for this is simple – automation works well when it’s well-constructed, but it still relies on a trigger or preceding action to prompt that next function.

Every single one of TechBeacon’s 6 DevSecOps best practices relies on solid monitoring and alerting – doesn’t that say a lot?

Coralogix: Who You Want In Your Corner

Engineered to support DevSecOps best practices, Coralogix is the ideal partner for helping you put security at the center of everything.

Alerts API allows you to feed ML-driven DevOps alerts straight into your workflows, enabling you to automate more efficient responses and even detect nefarious activity faster. Easy to query log data combined with automated benchmark reports ensure you’re always on top of your system health. Automated Threat Detection turns your web logs into part of your security stack.

With battle-tested software and a team of experts servicing some of the largest companies in the world, you can rely on Coralogix to keep your guard up.

In days gone by, highly regulated industries like pharmaceuticals and finance were the biggest targets for nefarious cyber actors, due to the financial resources at banks and drug companies’ disposal – their respective security standards were indicative of this. Verizon reports in 2020 that, whilst banks and pharma companies account for 25% of major data breaches, big tech, and supply chain are increasingly at risk.

Surely then, the way to protect against vulnerabilities and nefarious activities is to rigorously enforce security standards? Wrong.

In this piece we’re going to examine the landscape of information security policies today, and how new approaches and tools make security seamless.

Security Standards – As They Were

Security standards come in all shapes and sizes, some are relevant to developers, whilst some are more relevant to how a whole organization holds and handles data. Traditionally, security standards are enforced by an individual – typically an infosec or compliance persona. This approach has two flaws – the enforcer’s distance from the developers, and the broad strokes of infosec standards.

The Problem With the Old Way

Under this model, and particularly in big companies, information security and compliance is governed by separate teams or individuals. These people are normally non-technical and are logically separated from the development team. This means that the enforcers of security standards don’t always understand the implications of what they are enforcing, nor the people upon who they are imposing the standards.

Additionally, recent research has shown that the security standards that we all know are applied like blankets from industry to industry. With no specificity for development methodology, organizational resource, or data being handled, these overarching principles don’t engage the developers that should be adhering to them.

All this comes down to a reliance on people, be it compliance professionals or developers, to understand, enforce, and implement these policies. This is not only a manual task, but it’s also onerous and doesn’t embrace the models of successful agile product development and release.

DevSecOps – A New Way

If you’re familiar with Disney’s The Mandalorian, then you’ll know the unending mantra of “this is the way”, uttered by all members of the secret sect. DevSecOps has shown the technology industry that dictated standards aren’t the only way.

A shift-left mentality, DevSecOps requires organizations to bridge the gap (and in some cases, absorb the space) between development and security. An article on the rise and success of DevSecOps outlined three defining criteria of a true DevSecOps environment. First, developers should be in charge of security testing. Second, fixing security issues should be wholly managed by the development team. Third, ongoing security-related issues should be owned by the development team.

Simple enough, right?

Whilst the principles for DevSecOps success are straightforward, the practices are often less so. Creating a secure-by-design architecture and coding security elements into your applications are key ways of breaking down the silos that security standards created.

Security and Development – How to Promote Cohesion

Gartner states that cultural and organizational roadblocks are the largest impeders to the unification of development and security operations individuals and teams. Looking at research from Gartner, surveyed CIOs and leading software vendors, security should be wrapped around DevOps practices, not just shoved into the mix.

From Principle to Practice to Policy

What does wrapping security around DevOps mean? In theory, it’s allowing the expertise of SecOps engineers and compliance professionals to impact development. In practice, it means allowing these professionals’ knowledge of the changing security and threat landscape to permeate in day-to-day DevOps activities.

Take Kubernetes for example. It provides network policies, which under the traditional model, may be allocated as part of an overarching InfoSec strategy. Neither dynamic nor totally secure, this is setting yourself up for failure. Implementing Zero Trust Networking is a DevSecOps mindset which, with tools like Istio, gives a service mesh providing both application and container-level security through alerting policies and active prevention.

Alerting Makes DevSecOps Easy

Alerting is key. It takes away the idea of rigid security standards and instead provides the flexibility of implementable policies throughout the application and network layers. In an article covering the DevSecOps keys to success, there is one recurring theme – use whatever tools at your disposal to increase process speed. A mature monitoring and alerting system is the lynchpin to rapid security and development practices and provides the foundation for automation.

By integrating monitoring and alerting capabilities into a SIEM dashboard, security events can be analyzed in a cross-cutting way to tie together many extraneous factors which would otherwise be disparate. Adding automation, even something as simple as advanced messaging, on top shortens response time and guarantees uptime. When so much of DevSecOps is reliability engineering, your monitoring and alerting tool is the quarterback in your stack.

Coralogix is the Platform for Your New DevSecOps Culture

Out-of-the-box fully wrapped SaaS monitoring and altering with built-in threat detection – “this is the way”.

Coralogix provides policy-based analysis to support your monitoring. On top of that, you get alerting with myriad integrations to plug into every component of your stack. This alerting allows for sophisticated policy creation based on security requirements, empowering a true DevSecOps mentality and workflow within your organization.

Features like Flow Anomaly, ML-powered Dynamic Alerts, and a simple Alerts API mean you no longer need rigid security standards. Intelligent, inbuilt policies guarantee your applications and infrastructure can stay protected and progressive.